Search for: All records

In addition to engineering new pathways for synthesis, synthetic biologists rewire cells to carry out “programmable” functions, an example being the creation of wound‐healing probiotics. Engineering regulatory circuits and synthetic machinery, however, can be deleterious to cell function, particularly if the “metabolic burden” is significant. Here, a synthetic regulatory circuit previously constructed to directEscherichiacolito swim toward hydrogen peroxide, a signal of wound generation, was shown to work even with coexpression of antibiotic resistance genes and genes associated with lactose utilization. We found, however, that cotransformation with a second vector constitutively expressing GFP (as a marker) and additionally conferring resistance to kanamycin and tetracycline resulted in slower velocity (Δ~6 μm/s) and dramatically reduced growth rate (Δ > 50%). The additional vector did not, however, alter the run‐and‐tumble ratio or directional characteristics of H₂O₂–dependent motility. The main impact of this additional burden was limited to slowing cell velocity and growth, suggesting that reprogrammed cell motility by minimally altering native regulatory circuits can be maintained even when extraneous burden is placed on the host cell. © 2019 American Institute of Chemical EngineersBiotechnol. Prog., 35: e2778, 2019.